01 The record
- 8951–8954: the despatch, addressed “Ser:mo Principe”. Clear news paragraphs (the Nuncio Monti, the Marquis of Vigliena, Spinola, a rumour that Monterrey had died at Genoa) alternate with long cipher paragraphs marked 8 and ‡ in the margin.
- 8955–8959: the decipherment, in another hand. It gives the whole letter in clear, clear passages included, with the ciphered paragraphs numbered 6, 7, 8 and 9.
- 8960–8964: a second copy, enciphered with different groups (1,405 against 840 for the same text), dated “Madrid li 26 Ott:re 1628”. DECODE’s transcription gives the year as 1606.
- 8965: address leaf, numbered 74. 8966: a deciphered page of Mocenigo’s despatch of 29 October 1628, CSP Venice 21 no. 520 (long consultations on English and Dutch trade, a licence said to have been got by a Jesuit for some 100,000 crowns).
The DECODE images are not in the public domain and may be published only with the archive’s permission, so none are reproduced here.
02 The cipher
The groups are numbers written as clusters. The looped sign that looks like b is the period’s 6, and the s-like sign is a 5, which DECODE’s transcription renders as “13” or “21”. Every group has the form 5 or 6, then an optional 1–4, then two digits. After the first digit only 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8 and 9 occur. The two copies have about 2,245 groups of 355 kinds. The group 6499 marks the edges of the numbered paragraphs. Each group stands for about two letters of plaintext: paragraph 6 (“Et già si è publicato… di ogni gran Casa di Spagna”) has 386 groups for about 760 letters, and paragraph 7 (“Continuo io… in alcun tempo”) has 245 for about 445. That makes it a syllabic cipher or nomenclator, not a simple homophonic alphabet.
Recovering the key from the ciphertext alone failed. Letter-by-letter homophonic annealing against a Renaissance Italian model gave gibberish, although the same solver decrypts a synthetic Italian homophonic cipher of the same size without error. Treating whole prefix classes as nulls did not help either. A monotone alignment of the groups against the decipherment, seeded with the Olivares runs, settled into even two-letter splits and gave no usable values. Rebuilding the key would need a fresh, group-exact transcription and more anchors.
03 The decipherment
The two ciphered paragraphs checked against the cipher, from the decipherment (8955–8956):
[6] Et già si è publicato, che seguirà anco il Re alla giornata, persistendo l’Ecc.mo nelle prime risolutioni, che il Re ò abbracci le tregue, overo le faccia assignam.ti pronti, effettivi, et sufficienti per le imprese necessarie. Il Conte di Olivares ha desiderato con buone parole, et promesse condurlo à risolutione di ritornar in Fiandra; anco con qualche violente termine lo hà procurato, ma il Marchese constantem.te è stato ne’ primi propositi, nè hà potuto non ricever molti disgusti. Continuano quelli delli conti, che le sono dimandati, et quello che più lo affligge è haver dato sua figlia in moglie à Don Diego Messia, il quale è mantenuto dal Conte di Olivares nel posto di auttorità et gratia che haveva prima, se le diminuisse la speranza del titolo di Grande, et resta la figliola con minor fortuna di quella che senza il favore del Conte di Olivares poteva conseguire con il parentado di ogni gran Casa di Spagna.
[7] Continuo io nelli affari propri con molti soldati di S. M.tà, li quali si offerseno di nuovo al servitio della Ser.ma; alcuni sono officiali di molta esperienza, et con tanto maggior affetto le corrispondo; sono la maggior parte Napolitani de’ terzi reformati… et però certa cosa, che il Re non può render tutti contenti, et molti con ragione si vegono abbandonati, et altri senza le sodisfattioni de’ proprij crediti, et desperati di poter li conseguire in alcun tempo.
That is: it is given out that the King will go on campaign. Spinola holds to his first position, that the King must either accept the truce with the Dutch or give him ready and sufficient funds for the campaign. Olivares has tried fair words and harsher means to send him back to Flanders, and has failed. Spinola is also harried over his accounts, and grieved that he married his daughter to Diego Mesía, whom Olivares keeps in favour while holding back the grandeeship. Paragraph 7 reports Mocenigo’s recruiting of officers left unpaid by Philip IV, most of them Neapolitans from disbanded tercios, for the service of the Republic. Paragraphs 8 and 9 (8957–8959) cover Savoy’s campaign against Genoa over Oneglia and Ormea, Cottington’s cancelled journey, Rubens, Catalonia and Valencia, and Savoy’s bid for the government of Milan.
Grades: the decipherment is contemporary (H). The transcription above is a first pass from the scans. Two words are doubtful (M): “prime risolutioni” and “terzi reformati”.
04 What remains open
- The key. It is a syllabic nomenclator; “conte di Olivares” = 672 2133 6210 2190 62x9 637 2127 in both copies is the only group run tied to text so far.
- A full transcription of the decipherment pages 8955–8959. DECODE carries only a rough one.
- DECODE R1862 (Busta 27 f. 354, 1628, four pages, “Ser.mo Principe”) is in the same cipher; DECODE places it at Rome, so it may be another Venetian despatch rather than Mocenigo’s. It has not been examined beyond its first page.
05 Sources
- DECODE R1874 (16 images, login) and its transcription DOC_R1874_D3607 (2020). Sibling R1862.
- Calendar of State Papers, Venice, vol. 21 (1628–1629), ed. A. B. Hinds (1916), no. 515 (Madrid, 26 Oct 1628) and no. 520 (29 Oct 1628): British History Online.
- S. Tomokiyo, “Venetian ciphers” (cryptiana), for the other Busta 30 records (R1870, R1872, R1873).
Notes, token files and solver scripts: targets/r1874/ in the repository.
